Stintt vs TrackingTime
- No timer to start or stop
- Nothing installed on the laptop
- Timesheet drafted from calendar events
TrackingTime makes manual tracking pleasant to look at. Stintt removes the manual part — the week is drafted from calendar events before anyone opens it.
TrackingTimeStart-and-stop timers
- Someone has to press start
- Right only if they remember
Calendar events, read-only
- The week is already written down
- Chat covers what never got booked
- No agent on anyone’s laptop
Accurate only for as long as somebody remembers to press the button.
Runs in a browser; the desktop and browser-extension apps are optional conveniences.
Stintt vs TrackingTime, row by row
The same twelve rows every comparison on this site uses, so nothing is cherry-picked for TrackingTime. Where a capability is optional or plan-gated, it is marked partly rather than rounded either way.
TrackingTime does the timesheet-as-timeline idea well: the day is a horizontal track, entries are blocks, and it is genuinely nicer to review than a list of rows. But the blocks still get there because a person put them there, which means the same Friday reconstruction with better typography. Stintt starts from the other end. The calendar already holds a timeline of what was booked; the timesheet is derived from it, and review is the only manual step.
Compared August 2026 from each vendor's public documentation and pricing pages. Products change — check with the vendor before you decide.
Three steps, and none of them is a migration.
There is no import from TrackingTime, and pretending otherwise would be the first promise we broke. There does not need to be — a connected calendar arrives carrying the history a new tracker would spend months collecting.
Connect a calendar
Read-only access, granted once. It cannot create, edit or delete an event, and there is nothing to install on anyone's machine.
The history is already there
Existing calendar events become a draft timesheet immediately, so the first week is a review rather than an empty grid waiting for data to accrue.
Review, approve, bill
Correct the draft, log anything off-calendar from chat, and approve. Only approved entries reach a client invoice, and discarded time stays on the record.
What TrackingTime leaves on the table
Three specific things, not a feature count.
The timeline fills itself
TrackingTime gives you a timeline to fill. Stintt gives you a timeline already filled from calendar events, and asks you to correct it.
Off-calendar work has a one-line escape hatch
Send "client call 25m" to a chat bot the moment it ends. No app to open, no syntax to learn.
Approved hours are the only billable ones
A review step sits between logged time and a client invoice, and discarded entries are kept as a record rather than deleted.
When TrackingTime is the better choice
If a lot of your work has no calendar footprint at all — heads-down production, shift work, ad-hoc tasks — a fast manual tracker with a clean interface is a reasonable answer, and TrackingTime is one of the better ones.
If none of that describes your team, the rest of this page is the case for switching. If some of it does, TrackingTime is a reasonable buy and we would rather you knew that here than after a trial.
What people ask about TrackingTime and Stintt
A calendar view shows the entries you created. Stintt goes the other way: your calendar events are the source, and the entries are generated from them — including the eighteen months of history that already exist in the calendar when you connect.
Time is categorized (meetings, focus, admin, break, out-of-office) and attributed to clients for billing. Jira and ClickUp connect for personal timesheets so entries can sit against real issues. Deep project hierarchies are TrackingTime's strength, not ours.
Yes. Pending entries collect in one inbox with who, when and what. Approve, edit-and-approve, or send back with a note — and only approved entries reach an invoice.
